skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Is the wall only to keep illegals out, or is it also to
keep the rich in? The Internal Revenue Service, which many hope Mr. Trump will
rein in, on January 25 asserted its power to revoke the passports of those the
IRS says owe taxes. In our latest book, Money,
Morality & The Machine, Craig R. Smith and I warned of this. This
new Progressive rule declares that citizens who owe taxes would not be
permitted to leave the United States. These citizens would be required to pay
the demanded tax and penalties to exit, or live out their lives without leaving
the United States under a kind of nationwide house arrest. [more...]
Big
news over the weekend came from states, organizations, and public and private
companies speaking out against President Trump’s immigration restrictions.
Moreover, the long-awaited Super Bowl commercials took their 30-second to
1-minute ad space to fuel the controversy. It seems that the heavyweights are
trying to warn the country that this action could hurt our economy. On Sunday,
major U.S. tech companies such as Alphabet (Google), Apple, Facebook, and
nearly 100 others, argued in a letter to the President that banning visitors
would hurt their businesses. [more...]
President
Trump signed a memorandum on February 3, 2017 which directs the Department of
Labor to undertake a new “economic and legal analysis” of a pending piece of
Dodd-Frank legislation - the new Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule - which was
to be implemented in April. The memorandum seeks to determine whether investors
and the financial industry have been and will be harmed by the directive, in
the areas of access to financial advice, access to investment products, job
loss within the financial industry, changes in investment costs and increased
litigation. Many news outlets misreported that the President issued an
executive order that halted implementation of the Fiduciary rule, but that was
not the case. “To the extent that the new analysis reveals problems, the Labor
secretary is directed to ‘publish for notice and comment a [new] proposed rule
rescinding or revising the rule.’” [more...]